CSSquirrel A look at web development and web design by Kyle Weems

Today’s comic features Internet Explorer 9. Well, it features that browser if it existed as a tough-as-nails video-game playing entity in the world of Tron. The theme of today’s jaunt owes itself to the gorgeous new trailers for Tron Legacy. I used to think every geek worth their salt had seen the original movie in this franchise, but recently learned at least three of my co-workers at Mindfly have gone their whole lives without witnessing the amazing light-cycle battles and disc duels.

As a result, I now live in a world where everything I’ve taken for granted is flipped upside down. I need to make a rental and rectify the situation.

The rest of the comic owes itself to the cornucopia of information now flooding the web tubes about IE9, starting at SXSW and running over us like a tsunami from Redmond. The IE team’s blog is a pipe filled with revelations. Drink from it. HTML5 support including <video>? Check. Prettier typography? Check. SVG? Check. Way faster JavaScript? Check. Adding support for some CSS3? (Note the word “some”, folks. The concept of complete “CSS3 Support” is a myth.)

What the heck is going on? If there was one thing we could rely on as website creators, it was that the Big Blue E was a drunken frat boy knocking over the furniture, throwing up on the carpet, and generally making a mess of any tidy rooms you designed. Yet, version Nine Point Oh is not only helping wash away the stink of earlier failures (like Eight’s noble attempts at correcting the errors of Six and Seven), but rather pushing aggressively forward to be off the bench and in the game with other “modern browsers.”

I guess we’ll all have to accept the truth: Microsoft is not in fact a bunch of blithering idiots. Having met several of their employees, I’d say it’s quite the opposite. They’re aware of what they need to do to keep relevant (or rather, regain relevancy) in the browser game, and they’re doing it.

I’m not adopting IE as my browser of choice anytime soon. But I for one am jazzed and excited to think of how soon I can ditch <embed> and <object> in future sites for a simple clean <video> without making 62% of the web’s users incapable of seeing a video.

IE 9’s improvements might be bad news for competing vendors trying to distinguish themselves from the dominant browser (although I doubt IE is catching up fast enough to cause worries for them yet), but it’s good news for designers and users everywhere.

Dean “Good Luck Pronouncing It” Hachamovitch (who stars in the old, old CSSquirrel comic Passion of the Dean) made a post on the IEBlog today giving us an early look at IE9 and the improvements it’ll contain. These improvements contain (but are not limited to) improved CSS3 support, better-looking fonts, hardware acceleration, better standards support and faster performance. Woo!

But some, like Dave “Maximus” Shea, aren’t impressed, as he makes clear here.

I get it. We’ve been hit in the face by Internet Explorer so many times that it’s impossible to think well of it. But the increasing speed at which they’ve started to bring out new versions, and the clear improvements of 8 over 7, have me convinced that what they’re doing is a good thing. Yes, there’s no mention of canvas support. Yes, some of these features were supported years ago elsewhere. But they’re trying hard to improve, and more importantly, they are improving.

So, I for one am glad to see this announcement. It makes me happy. Also, I secretly hope that if the version numbers keep going up on IE, certain stodgy corps will be shamed into updating past IE6.

Hey, a guy can hope. Right?

I don’t need to write too much about this particular topic, as I’ve ranted about it in the past, but I couldn’t help but notice Andy Clarke’s micro-rants on Twitter about Opera’s recent bad behavior towards Microsoft (see here, here, here, here, here and even here for some samples of his thoughts). I was hoping to see a blog post manifest from him that I could read while laughing deeply, perhaps even shooting milk from my nose. Alas, Andy’s better sense took hold and he did the smart thing and went and watched Star Trek.

I also saw Star Trek. It was good. It was better than good. Go watch it, you’ll love it. I promise.

As it stands, I’ll take a swing or two in his place. First, let me direct you to today’s comic featuring Andy Clarke, wherein a couple of cheap shots are made at Opera’s expense. Then, continue reading.

First, I’m aware that browser usage statistics are like a dark art, much akin to necromancy and astrology, where accuracy isn’t really achievable. But the fact is (and take a look at Wikipedia’s page on the topic) that Opera according to some of these browser usage sources does in fact have less users than Netscape.

That’s right, there’s still people using Netscape. How scary is that? I wonder if they think grunge is alive and watch reruns of Family Matters while downloading websites on 14kbps modems. And just to reiterate, there’s more of these people (according to some sources) than there are people using Opera.

Beyond that, Google Chrome is the new hot browser in town and has already exceeded Opera’s user base in less than a year. That’s right, less than a year.

Look, I’m not saying it’s the number of users that count. After all, IE6 is utter rubbish and it’s still being used by too many people out there. What I am saying is that instead of wasting your company’s public image whining about the fact that Microsoft is doing us all a favor and forcing IE8 updates over their update system, you could be spending time looking at your own browser and figuring out why among other things a browser that has been dragged along for a decade by AOL then finally shot in the head (aka, Netscape) still has more users than your product.

Instead of making absurd suggestions that your competition serve your product via their update service, maybe you could look at Google Chrome and devise how it so rapidly out-paced you in such a short period of time?

Microsoft’s browser, even its newest version, isn’t even close to the coolest browser on the market. I don’t like Internet Explorer, and I only use it to check website compatibility in my job. But I don’t use Opera either, and that’s because (among other reasons) it has thus far convinced me (and the rest of the world) that it’s not worth the effort of installing and using rather than Firefox, or Safari, or the other web standards-compliant browsers on the market. It’s enough to make me wonder why we consider Opera part of the Big Four (now the Big Five). At this rate, with even terminated browsers giving Opera a run for the money, should we expand that name to the Big Six?

Is Opera a good browser? Yes. If that’s not the reason that it’s being ignored, than what is? Perhaps a lack of add-on support. I’ve always felt that Opera’s too busy telling people how to surf the web, and not spending enough time figuring out the features people want. Firefox isn’t popular on accident.

But I’ll tell you the number one reason why I don’t use Opera. It’s because of the company’s public behavior with their legal actions and petulant whining. The rank-and-file employees are talented people creating a worthwhile (albeit, not standout) product. But the big shots on top cost the company their credibility every time they make a cheap, transparently spiteful shot at the current market leader.

And lest I let the others off the hook, shame on Mozilla and Google for getting involved with the EU nonsense. Focus on your products, not on begging the government to get people to install your browsers for you.