<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inline-Block and Banging my Head Against Liquid Layouts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cssquirrel.com/2008/05/30/inline-block-and-banging-my-head-against-liquid-layouts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cssquirrel.com/2008/05/30/inline-block-and-banging-my-head-against-liquid-layouts/</link>
	<description>One nut's look at the world of web design</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 07:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: kyle</title>
		<link>http://www.cssquirrel.com/2008/05/30/inline-block-and-banging-my-head-against-liquid-layouts/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 15:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=33#comment-102</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link! Although, after giving it a look, it appears this technique is fraught with a few perils, and possibly a good deal more headache, than just swallowing the pill and using a wrapper.

CSS3 spec approval/implementation could accelerate whenever it wants. Really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link! Although, after giving it a look, it appears this technique is fraught with a few perils, and possibly a good deal more headache, than just swallowing the pill and using a wrapper.</p>
<p>CSS3 spec approval/implementation could accelerate whenever it wants. Really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Meyer</title>
		<link>http://www.cssquirrel.com/2008/05/30/inline-block-and-banging-my-head-against-liquid-layouts/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Meyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 03:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cssquirrel.com/?p=33#comment-84</guid>
		<description>I think you're looking for "The One True Layout", which uses negative margins but no wrapper divs.  See http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/.

It's also a hack, albeit one with a little less markup, but absent any real grid-layout system, we're pretty much stuck with hacks, all the way down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re looking for &#8220;The One True Layout&#8221;, which uses negative margins but no wrapper divs.  See <a href="http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/" rel="nofollow">http://www.positioniseverything.net/articles/onetruelayout/</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a hack, albeit one with a little less markup, but absent any real grid-layout system, we&#8217;re pretty much stuck with hacks, all the way down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
